Standard Curve

 
User#:Hit Counter
Bio 420/642
 Molecular Biology
Department of Biological Sciences, Lehman College

Search course content for:

E-mail Dr. Wurtzel

Home ] Metric System ] Plasmids ] Markers ] Solution Calcs ] Materials ]
Laboratory instructor:

 

 

Standard Curve Generation:

A standard curve is a graphic representation of the relationship between the distance of migration from the well of  molecular weight standards and the apparent size of the molecular weight standards. Due to the inverse square degeneration of electromagnetic field strength with distance and the wide range (3 magnitudes) or size-resolving power of electrophoretic gels,  a base 10 logarithmic transformation of molecular weights lends a prettier picture. The distance of migration is not transformed so the plot is semilogrithmic. Semilog graph paper with two-three cycles is available, so that mathematical transformation of the data before plotting is obviated.  Here is a sample plot:

std.GIF (458047 bytes)

Another way to make a standard curve is with a computer program. Common programs like Microsoft's Excel have a linear regression function based on the least squares algorithm in the data analysis add-in.

The data is entered in a table as below:

Molecular Weight

Migration

23.3

1.5

9.4

2.4

6.5

3

4.3

3.8

2.3

5.5

2

6

An then may be scatter-plotted using the graph wizard.

wpe8.gif (1995 bytes)

A linear regression analysis gives the equation of the line for easy interpolation of unknown migration values to size values. Here's a sample of the regression output:

Regression Statistics

Multiple R

0.833527

R Square

0.694767

Adjusted R Square

0.618458

Standard Error

4945.177

Observations

6

 

Coefficients

Standard Error

t State

P-value

Intercept

21962.93916

5058.814266

4.341519

0.012238

X Variable 1

-3782.77635

1253.652231

-3.0174

0.039263

Notice the fit of the line is not great (R2=0.69). A log transformation of the molecular weights or a geometric regression would be better. You need a fancier program than Excel. Anyway, the coefficient of x is -3783 and the y intercept is 21963, so the  equation of the line relating molecular weight to migration is:

Molecular Weight = -3783(Migration) + 21963

for  a migration of 3 cm, then:

Molecular Weight = -3783(3) + 21963

= 4466 BP, this is way off!, the expected value is 6500 (see the original data),
the residual is 2034 bp.

Let's try a log10 transformation of the molecular weights:

Migration

Molecular Weight

LOG10

1.5

23300

4.367356

2.4

9400

3.973128

3

6500

3.812913

3.8

4300

3.633468

5.5

2300

3.361728

6

2000

3.30103

Now the linear regression looks better!

Regression Statistics

Multiple R

0.973505

R Square

0.947712

Adjusted R Square

0.93464

Standard Error

0.102285

Observations

6

And the equation of the line is:

Coefficients

Standard Error

t Stat

P-value

Intercept

4.55852

0.104636

43.56557

1.66E-06

X Variable 1

-0.22079

0.02593

-8.51465

0.001044

log10Molecular Weight = -0.22 (Migration) + 4.56

or, for example, a 6 cm migration

log10 Molecular Weight = -0.22 (6) + 4.56

= antilog10(3.24)

=1737

This is a little better. Compare it to your hand made graph. Still, connecting the data points,  point to point, with straight lines, as in the scatter plot above, is often more accurate than regression, because of inconsistencies (non-linearity) in the gel system. Gel analyses programs designed for molecular biologists often offer this connect-the-dots mode of standard curve interpolation. Statistics programs do not. Here is a link to a web site providing such an approach to the connect-the dots method.